From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bug-cc-mode and emacs-devel
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:28 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G8ifI-0003QF-4u@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20060803.205329.242725968.jet@gyve.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154632635 17539 80.91.229.2 (3 Aug 2006 19:17:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:17:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 03 21:17:11 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G8igi-0007C7-KZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:16:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G8igh-0007Er-BH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:16:55 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G8ifL-0006fY-6n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:31 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G8ifK-0006fC-Ox
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:30 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8ifK-0006f6-Fl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:30 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G8iii-0007Vy-Fp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:19:00 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G8ifI-0003QF-4u; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:28 -0400
Original-To: Masatake YAMATO <jet@gyve.org>
In-reply-to: <20060803.205329.242725968.jet@gyve.org> (message from Masatake
	YAMATO on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:53:29 +0900 (JST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58062
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/58062>

    When I write a patch for cc-mode, should I send to whether
    bug-cc-mode or emacs-devel?

    Generally, I send my patches to bug-cc-mode.

That is generally right.  But if you think we should install
a change urgently in Emacs, send it to emacs-devel.