From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Bug] "You can't edit this part of the Custom buffer" Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:59:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y7ue1vuz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r7051ts5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154142036 13734 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2006 03:00:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 29 05:00:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6f3q-0008Es-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 05:00:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6f3p-0001bi-OO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G6f3G-0001Ms-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G6f3F-0001MM-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6f3F-0001MI-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:59:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G6f5M-0006UO-U1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G6f3E-0006Fs-4f; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:59:40 -0400 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <87r7051ts5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:14:18 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57766 Archived-At: What do you mean by "worked right with editable fields"? Without `custom-no-edit', the "read-only" message pops up anytime you try inserting in a Custom buffer, not only inside a field (try it). I tried it before, and tried it now -- there is no such problem. Your latest change to cus-edit was buggy too---it made self-insert command keys activate buttons when the cursor is over them. Yes, that was a bug. Sorry. I'll try it again fixing that. > Should buttons work by having their own keymaps? It seems cleaner > in principle. That would require a big reworking of the widget internals. We can do this after the release. I did not have in mind changing it now. The question is, is that the right way for things to work?