From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:04:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <81CCA6588E60BB42BE68BD029ED4826008838221@wimex2.wim.midas-kapiti.com> <44C0EA68.40105@gmx.at> <44C1EE07.3080502@gmx.at> <44C750EC.2020004@gmx.at> <85irlk6l00.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154016524 30635 80.91.229.2 (27 Jul 2006 16:08:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, simon.marshall@misys.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 27 18:08:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G68PM-0006tV-DW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:08:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G68PL-0002V9-QP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G68LE-0008SY-4W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G68LD-0008RV-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G68LD-0008RI-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G68N0-0006NB-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:05:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G68LB-0000MT-NA; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:04:01 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85irlk6l00.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:48:15 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57682 Archived-At: Wouldn't it be safer if such counts would be compared for equality only? It would be, but I doubt it is possible in general to use only equality comparisons. Does someone want to study the question and see?