From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using quail input methods to translate buffer text. Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:19:04 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87k66rlqys.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87y7v5fvp2.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <8764i9caau.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87zmfkhqfm.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87u05shq6q.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ac7hupt2.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87lkqob2fe.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153873216 27528 80.91.229.2 (26 Jul 2006 00:20:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pj@heslin.eclipse.co.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 26 02:20:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5X8C-0001F7-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:20:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5X8B-0006FL-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5X7y-0006AW-Kr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:19:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5X7w-00065h-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:19:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5X7w-00065a-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:19:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.246.133] (helo=mx1.aist.go.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G5X9L-0005wd-28; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.12]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k6Q0JmcP020823; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:19:48 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k6Q0Jlvw013655; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:19:47 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1G5X7A-0007wA-00; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:19:04 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:13:43 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57647 Archived-At: In article , Richard Stallman writes: >> It is not out of the question to change the code of quail, or even its >> internal structure. Whether it is worth while to do so in this case >> depends on details, such as how much benefit users would receive, and >> on whether someone is willing to do the work. > Aren't we in feature-freeze state now? The proposed one is > a new feature. It may be ok to include it if the feature is > important enough to break `feature-freeze'. > I thought this was for after the release. > I don't think we should install this now. > So why hesitate to change Quail's structure? Ok, I see. Then, I'll work on emacs-unicode-2 branch to modify Quail so that such a feature can be more easily implemented. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org