From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using quail input methods to translate buffer text. Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:16:44 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87k66rlqys.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87y7v5fvp2.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <8764i9caau.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87zmfkhqfm.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87u05shq6q.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ac7hupt2.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87lkqob2fe.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153811889 18399 80.91.229.2 (25 Jul 2006 07:18:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, pj@heslin.eclipse.co.uk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 25 09:18:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5HB0-0007ap-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:17:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5HAz-0000VA-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:17:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5HAe-0000Un-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:17:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5HAc-0000Ub-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5HAc-0000UY-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.246.133] (helo=mx1.aist.go.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G5HBr-0006kM-JW; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:18:52 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.12]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k6P7HSfK025247; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:17:28 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k6P7HQG6018530; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:17:26 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1G5H9o-0002eA-00; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:16:44 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:22:02 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57597 Archived-At: In article , Richard Stallman writes: > As Peter wrote, there's no way to make it work 100% with the > current implementation of quail. We have to change internal > structure/code of quail somehow. > It is not out of the question to change the code of quail, or even its > internal structure. Whether it is worth while to do so in this case > depends on details, such as how much benefit users would receive, and > on whether someone is willing to do the work. Aren't we in feature-freeze state now? The proposed one is a new feature. It may be ok to include it if the feature is important enough to break `feature-freeze'. But I think that is only when the new feature is just addition and doesn't require changing of existing code. Or, are you talking about the work after the release? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org