From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Problem report #88
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:54 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G51e2-00089d-TT@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200607171759.k6HHxWvB025678@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153752423 32404 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2006 14:47:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 24 16:47:00 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G51hj-0002sK-Tw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:46:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G51hj-0001de-CU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:46:43 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G51e5-0006Qk-Bc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:57 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G51e4-0006QS-N6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:56 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G51e4-0006QM-IN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:56 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G51fA-0000M2-Nk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:44:05 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G51e2-00089d-TT; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:54 -0400
Original-To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
In-reply-to: <200607171759.k6HHxWvB025678@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:59:32 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57546
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57546>

I think this is safe, because it is impossible for 
FACE_FROM_ID (f, DEFAULT_FACE_ID) to be null
after realize_basic_faces succeeds.

Likewise, #87 is not a real problem.

I will add an assertion to make these reports go away.