From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using quail input methods to translate buffer text. Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:41:29 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87k66rlqys.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87y7v5fvp2.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <8764i9caau.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87zmfkhqfm.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87u05shq6q.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ac7hupt2.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> <87lkqob2fe.fsf@heslin.eclipse.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153705382 3821 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2006 01:43:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pj@heslin.eclipse.co.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 24 03:43:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pTF-0008Rz-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:42:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pTE-0001QH-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pSj-0001Fn-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pSi-0001FK-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pSi-0001FB-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [150.29.246.133] (helo=mx1.aist.go.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G4pTg-0000Lb-86; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:43:24 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.12]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k6O1gIXr023127; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:18 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id k6O1gB76028077; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:42:13 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1G4pRp-00060t-00; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:41:29 +0900 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:21:08 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57514 Archived-At: In article , Richard Stallman writes: > I think it's not worth working on quail-conv to make it work > correctly for all cases. How about just make it work well > for simple input methods (i.e. ones that (quail-simple) > return t) and reject complicated input methods. > That might be reasonable as a first step; but if quail-conv is useful, > we really should aim to make it work 100% as the ultimate goal. As Peter wrote, there's no way to make it work 100% with the current implementation of quail. We have to change internal structure/code of quail somehow. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org