From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:04:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0607180138x35e9d9bft3e42f20cb369795c@mail.gmail.com> <200607181929.k6IJTZN9028639@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153289114 728 80.91.229.2 (19 Jul 2006 06:05:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, ralphm@members.fsf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 19 08:05:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G35BH-0002QM-7i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:05:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G35BG-0004V9-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G35B4-0004Pe-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G35B3-0004OK-Iu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G35B3-0004O8-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G35E5-0001lu-70; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1G35B0-00064L-CJ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:04:54 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200607181929.k6IJTZN9028639@jane.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:29:35 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57321 Archived-At: I should have been more precise here. cl.el redefines some often used _macros_ which get inlined when compiled. So this increases the pure space used in all compiled versions of files that use those macros. I don't quite follow. Why does the redefinition made by cl.el alter the size of the expansion of these macro calls? Can you give an example case where that occurs?