From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should catchlist elements be marked during GC?
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:07:40 -0400
Message-ID: <E1G1Exo-00067H-39@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3u05llsu2.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152850124 29834 80.91.229.2 (14 Jul 2006 04:08:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:08:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 14 06:08:43 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G1Eym-0002o0-Fr
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:08:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G1Eym-0004wf-1D
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:08:40 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G1Exq-0004U8-7K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:07:42 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G1Exp-0004So-KN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:07:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G1Exo-0004Sk-Ve
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:07:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G1Ezj-0002eU-BX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:09:39 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1G1Exo-00067H-39; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:07:40 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3u05llsu2.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56991
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/56991>

    During GC, we don't explicitly go through the catchlist, marking the
    TAG and VAL member of each element.

Yes we do.  Here's the code from Fgarbage_collect.

  for (catch = catchlist; catch; catch = catch->next)
    {
      mark_object (catch->tag);
      mark_object (catch->val);
    }