From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: Lingering input pending
	withmotifmenu bar]
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:14:03 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Fyhj9-0000XW-Sg@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMAEGACJAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152245732 13713 80.91.229.2 (7 Jul 2006 04:15:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 04:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 07 06:15:30 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyhkU-00043z-SQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:15:27 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyhkU-0003fW-9a
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:15:26 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyhjB-0002Kn-Tx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:14:05 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyhjB-0002Jw-8U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:14:05 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyhjA-0002Jk-St
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:14:04 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FyhjV-0007am-N7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:14:25 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Fyhj9-0000XW-Sg; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:14:04 -0400
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMAEGACJAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56689
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/56689>

    The idea would be to have a simple test that code could use to tell whether
    an event or an event type was user-initiated or not.

That is starting to make some sense.  Such a distinction may be
useful.  But maybe it is only needed inside sit-for, as part of fixing
the bug that we're now talking about.  If we find it is useful
elsewhere, then we can define a way for user code to check it.