From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jidanni@jidanni.org: Re: emacsclient additional arguments buried] Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877j2te9tu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152046393 2069 80.91.229.2 (4 Jul 2006 20:53:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 04 22:53:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxrtL-0002ZL-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:53:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxrtL-0000PH-AA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:53:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxrt7-0000OQ-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxrt6-0000OC-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxrt6-0000O9-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fxs6r-0002VT-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Fxrt5-0000ya-RK; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:51 -0400 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <877j2te9tu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:14:21 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56524 Archived-At: What exactly needs to be done here? If we don't want the additional files to be buried, that is easy enough to do (one-liner patch below). But I'm not sure that is the correct thing to do---it could be construed as interfering with the server's buffer setup. I think he wants them to go at the front of the buffer list, as if each one had been visited when the server asked for it. At the same time, I can see how this might be undesirable for some users.