From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: mouse-autoselect-window needs a
	delay]
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:25:51 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FvdnT-00067x-Rz@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1FuHSl-0003JN-M9@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<878xnmunvy.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1151515602 16045 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2006 17:26:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:26:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 28 19:26:39 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FvdoD-0000ms-Ou
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:26:37 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FvdoD-0005cf-6f
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:26:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FvdnW-0005Ox-74
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:25:54 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FvdnV-0005OJ-7E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:25:53 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvdnU-0005OE-QB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:25:52 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fvdzr-000318-Q4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:38:39 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FvdnT-00067x-Rz; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:25:51 -0400
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <878xnmunvy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:36:49 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56261
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/56261>

    > This complaint seems valid.  Would someone like to address it?

    Could we delay this for after the release?  It's far from crucial.

We can.  But while we wait for someone else to check the files of the
Lisp manual, why shouldn't someone else fix this?