From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: BUG + FIX. Spurious "might not be defined at runtime" from
	byte-compile-file
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:18:38 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FiixK-0006WB-Fh@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1060523093259.796A-100000@acm.acm>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148437303 10816 80.91.229.2 (24 May 2006 02:21:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 02:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 24 04:21:42 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fij0E-0006kZ-S2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 04:21:39 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fij0E-00068r-8N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:21:38 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FiixM-0004yQ-7j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:18:40 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FiixL-0004xt-B0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:18:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiixL-0004xo-69
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:18:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fij1g-0006KS-EA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:23:08 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FiixK-0006WB-Fh; Tue, 23 May 2006 22:18:38 -0400
Original-To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1060523093259.796A-100000@acm.acm> (message from
	Alan Mackenzie on Tue, 23 May 2006 10:15:06 +0000 (GMT))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55174
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/55174>

This change is good, but could you also arrange
for the function `byte-compile' to display any such warnings
it has generated?