From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preload encoded-kb on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:33:21 +0900 Message-ID: References: <873bfds4xs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147998833 15772 80.91.229.2 (19 May 2006 00:33:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 19 02:33:45 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgsw3-0000Tu-64 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 May 2006 02:33:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgsw2-0002iP-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 20:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgsvs-0002hu-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 20:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgsvq-0002hY-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 20:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fgsvq-0002hV-FU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2006 20:33:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fgsz1-0002Is-Nw; Thu, 18 May 2006 20:36:48 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4J0XOVg002558; Fri, 19 May 2006 09:33:24 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4J0XNcX009203; Fri, 19 May 2006 09:33:23 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Fgsvh-00036Q-00; Fri, 19 May 2006 09:33:21 +0900 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 18 May 2006 21:52:21 +0300) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54740 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: >> But, as a developper, I see a merit in not preloading such >> files because then the debugging/testing of them gets a >> little bit easier (we don't have to dump Emacs). > Well, we have gobs of files preloaded already, so one more won't hurt > too much, I think. But I'll defer to Richard's decision. It seems that you misunderstand my point above. When *.el is not preloaded, we can test it by modifying and byte-compiling that file and just restart Emacs. If *.el is preloaded, we need an additional step; building Emacs. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org