From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fcall_process: wrong conversion Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:39:54 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147754421 1916 80.91.229.2 (16 May 2006 04:40:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 16 06:40:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfrLx-0001GD-Pf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 06:40:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfrLx-0003KM-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 00:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfrLi-0003Js-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 00:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfrLi-0003Jf-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 00:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfrLh-0003Jc-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 00:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FfrOG-0005R2-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 00:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4G4dtxP014207; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:39:55 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4G4dtYU009322; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:39:55 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FfrLe-00079L-00; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:39:54 +0900 Original-To: "Herbert Euler" In-reply-to: (herberteuler@hotmail.com) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54556 Archived-At: In article , "Herbert Euler" writes: > Oh, I see my fault. At the same time, I see whether a string is > unibyte-string is tested with STRING_MULTIBYTE (line 674 to 676, > lisp.h): > /* Nonzero if STR is a multibyte string. */ > #define STRING_MULTIBYTE(STR) \ > (XSTRING (STR)->size_byte >= 0) > I don't know how `size_byte' is set. Is it done by scanning a string > and watching the range of each byte (or some bytes) of the > string? No. XSTRING (STR)->size_byte is set when a string is created depending on how it is created (by make_unibyte_string or make_multibyte_string or ...). --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org