From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Possible `point-entered' `point-left' Text Property Bug Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 11:09:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r7304jck.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <873bfff7x2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mzdmyme4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147619381 3966 80.91.229.2 (14 May 2006 15:09:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 14 17:09:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfIDw-0003Sb-NA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 17:09:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfIDw-0005nC-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:09:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfIDh-0005mE-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfIDg-0005lv-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfIDg-0005ln-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:09:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FfIFt-0001vX-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FfIDf-0001gS-Rg; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:09:19 -0400 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <87mzdmyme4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Sat, 13 May 2006 11:28:35 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54445 Archived-At: Now, suppose we call `next-line'. The part of `line-move-finish' that processes intangibility, shown above, first moves point from its original position to point-min, rebinds inhibit-point-motion-hooks to nil, then moves to the desired point: Hmm, I agree that scanning from point-min is somewhat odd. Maybe it would be better to use (line-beginning-position) instead of (point-min) as the starting point. What do you think? Does that make it work?