From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Mode loaded twice with Local Variables
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:26 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FdspO-0006SH-NJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87vesfmsma.fsf@lrde.org>
	<52339.128.165.123.132.1147190882.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147283454 2197 80.91.229.2 (10 May 2006 17:50:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:50:54 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 10 19:50:48 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fdspe-0001ct-0C
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 19:50:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fdspd-0005Bm-A6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:41 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FdspQ-0005BL-Id
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FdspQ-0005B8-5U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdspQ-0005B5-07
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fdsqk-0000QM-Ki
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:51:50 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FdspO-0006SH-NJ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:50:26 -0400
Original-To: herring@lanl.gov
In-reply-to: <52339.128.165.123.132.1147190882.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
	(herring@lanl.gov)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54197
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/54197>

    How about this?  It seems simpler to me.

    Davis

I think this kind of change is ok for now.

    Is there some reason i-f isn't used?  Is it just to
    avoid errors for unfbound symbols?

We're going to call the function and get the error anyway.

					What if the major mode was itself an
    alias, or does that not happen?

It could, so the code should do indirect-function on both of them
and compare the results.