From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default face problem Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:41:26 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147265050 23458 80.91.229.2 (10 May 2006 12:44:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, jyavner@member.fsf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 10 14:44:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdo2A-0005P0-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 14:43:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdo2A-0003Q9-Fx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdo1u-0003PA-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdo1s-0003Md-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fdo1s-0003MU-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:43:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fdo36-0006S1-Hy; Wed, 10 May 2006 08:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4ACgfUm027389; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:42:41 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4ACge9s021389; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:42:41 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Fdo0M-0001fX-00; Wed, 10 May 2006 21:41:26 +0900 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54186 Archived-At: In article , storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: >> But, I really don't know if it's ok to call >> recompute_basic_faces recursively. Could you also test and >> verify it? > It works for me too. > Looking at the code, it seems to be safe. Thank you for checking it. I've just installed the patch. Perhaps, "#ifdef HAVE_X_WINDOWS ... #endif" is not necessary, but I can't test it on the other platform, and it seems that this problem happens only on X. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org