From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Problem report #1
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:15 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Fb2YV-0000lL-MB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1FarNA-0003c5-00@pot.isti.cnr.it>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146605878 25788 80.91.229.2 (2 May 2006 21:37:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 21:37:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 02 23:37:57 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fb2ZA-00051m-UK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 23:37:57 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fb2ZA-0000bv-Gx
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fb2YX-0000N4-6Z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:17 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fb2YW-0000Mj-P8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fb2YW-0000Me-Ee
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fb2Yl-0002eZ-7R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Fb2YV-0000lL-MB; Tue, 02 May 2006 17:37:15 -0400
Original-To: Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <E1FarNA-0003c5-00@pot.isti.cnr.it> (message from Francesco
	Potorti` on Tue, 02 May 2006 11:40:48 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53818
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/53818>

I made a mental slip, associating pop.c with you.
However, it turns out that there is no particular maintainer.
So it was good that you investigated this.

It sounds like you agree the code is dead.
That may not be a problem.  So how about if you add a comment
pointing out that that case cannot occur.  If that ever causes
a problem, the comment will show why.