From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 22:04:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r73ljvfa.fsf@myusenet.dyndns.org> <444F19B7.9080906@gmx.at> <44532003.1000709@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146535599 25545 80.91.229.2 (2 May 2006 02:06:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 02:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 02 04:06:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FakHb-0007lj-1C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:06:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FakHa-0005A7-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FakG1-0004EK-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FakG1-0004Dt-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FakG0-0004Dj-OR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FakG3-0001Yj-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FakFz-0004NN-Ko; Mon, 01 May 2006 22:04:55 -0400 Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-reply-to: (message from Kevin Rodgers on Mon, 01 May 2006 09:21:10 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53759 Archived-At: > Ok, would people please install the face-cycling patch? And define reb-match-[4-9] as well, to avoid cycling when there are less than 10 subexpressions. I don't see why we need them. What is wrong with cycling in that case?