From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default face problem Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:03 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87bquicu9k.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u08aapx5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146487959 11338 80.91.229.2 (1 May 2006 12:52:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, jyavner@member.fsf.org, storm@cua.dk, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 01 14:52:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaXtB-0004qT-OG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 14:52:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaXtB-0003PW-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 08:52:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaXs6-0002qQ-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 08:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaXs5-0002py-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 08:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaXs5-0002ps-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 08:51:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FaXvr-0000eS-Fr; Mon, 01 May 2006 08:55:19 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k41Cp5dI009786; Mon, 1 May 2006 21:51:05 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k41Cp4mM008741; Mon, 1 May 2006 21:51:04 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FaXrj-0000Di-00; Mon, 01 May 2006 21:51:03 +0900 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <87u08aapx5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 01 May 2006 08:34:08 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53722 Archived-At: In article <87u08aapx5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier writes: > Yes, it is. But IIRC the font selection mechanism tries to distinguish > between bitmap-scaled and vector-scaled fonts by checking the presence of > another instance of the font, with a non-0 size (i.e. a bitmap font). Which font selection mechanism do you mean here? At least, Emacs doesn't do that. Emacs determines a font is auto-scaled if it's RESY is not zero and POINT_SIZE is zero. Yes, it's surely a heuristic, but works for X servers of XFree86, X.org, and Solaris. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org