From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: allout patch - more safe-local-variables, plus autoloads Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:07:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2cd46e7f0604171211s5ef0e820gebc4e68b2ce2606d@mail.gmail.com> <8764l7m40w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r73uji3b.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u08oqhq3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145624858 6618 80.91.229.2 (21 Apr 2006 13:07:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 21 15:07:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWvMA-0008CX-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:07:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWvMA-0006aC-0p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:07:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWvLq-0006ZG-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWvLq-0006Yu-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWvLp-0006Yq-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWvNO-0004o0-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FWvLp-0008Tl-4k; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:07:09 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <87u08oqhq3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:34:54 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53185 Archived-At: In the case of boolean variables, history shows that they have a non-negligible chance of being extended in the future to give special meaning to some other values (typically some other symbol, or to values which are functions, ...). OK, I take the point. Would you like to make the change?