From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: allout patch - more safe-local-variables, plus autoloads
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:13 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FW47t-0007my-Of@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <2cd46e7f0604171211s5ef0e820gebc4e68b2ce2606d@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1FVpm4-0005uv-W8@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<8764l7m40w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145420259 22513 80.91.229.2 (19 Apr 2006 04:17:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 19 06:17:37 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FW488-0000sR-Ne
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:17:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FW487-0006DL-Ri
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:27 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FW47v-0006D0-MM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:15 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FW47v-0006Ci-4r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FW47u-0006Ca-RR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:14 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FW48w-0006jF-9R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:18:18 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FW47t-0007my-Of; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:17:13 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <8764l7m40w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:18:41 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53053
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/53053>

I think it is legitimate to use t for boolean variables.  All values
are safe for them.

If we don't use t, what would we use for them?