From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs-Xtra
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:09 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FUQwv-0000Cg-Ui@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17469.29694.605871.59144@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<E1FTsNU-0006YF-TW@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17469.53282.265431.557135@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<4nd5flnwtg.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145031376 23447 80.91.229.2 (14 Apr 2006 16:16:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 18:16:14 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQxq-00087s-Fs
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:16:06 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQxp-0007DY-Ql
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:16:05 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQwy-0006HZ-7x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:12 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQwx-0006GE-6E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FUQww-0006Fu-V6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:11 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FUQwx-0002Mk-Kr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:11 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FUQwv-0000Cg-Ui; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:10 -0400
Original-To: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
In-reply-to: <4nd5flnwtg.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> (message from Ted
	Zlatanov on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:40:27 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52873
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52873>

    Why not just volumes 1 and 2, like the ELisp reference manual?

If we sold them together, it would probably increase printing costs,
not decrease them.  (It might increase convenience.)

If we sold them separately, then this is really just a different description
of the previous proposal to split the manual.