From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:07 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FUQwt-0000CI-93@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <quack.20060411T2044.lthzmircvao@roar.cs.berkeley.edu>
	<86d5fn0xue.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
	<E1FTnAe-0004G2-Nh@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<86k69uv4ld.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
	<E1FU4q5-0001VG-Bo@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87bqv5xv8w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145031340 23324 80.91.229.2 (14 Apr 2006 16:15:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, merlyn@stonehenge.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 18:15:35 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQxD-00081O-DR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:15:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQxC-0006FZ-RN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:26 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQwu-0006D9-Js
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUQwu-0006Ci-5y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FUQwu-0006Ca-1P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FUQwu-0002MP-Mr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FUQwt-0000CI-93; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:07 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87bqv5xv8w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:10:16 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52872
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52872>

    As can be seen in "cperl-version", I've currently updated the code only upto
    version 5.0, even though I have imported upto version 5.10 on the
    vendor branch.

Thank you--I didn't know this was being done.

So, how well does our current Cperl mode work?
Should it be the default?