From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs-Xtra
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:26 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FUFlK-0006d5-9U@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17469.29694.605871.59144@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<E1FTsNU-0006YF-TW@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17469.53282.265431.557135@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144988326 4178 80.91.229.2 (14 Apr 2006 04:18:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 04:18:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 14 06:18:44 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUFlY-0003AQ-NJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 06:18:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUFlX-0006m7-CW
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:39 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUFlM-0006k1-9t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FUFlL-0006jD-OE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FUFlL-0006j0-Im
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FUFqo-00015p-G8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:24:06 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FUFlK-0006d5-9U; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:18:26 -0400
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <17469.53282.265431.557135@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:14:26 +1200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52855
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52855>

     > If this means splitting the Emacs Manual into two manuals, both of which
     > we would print, maybe that is a good idea--but how would we split it?

    In such a way that that fairly self contained topics like VC stay together.

That isn't a suggestion, just a criterion.

Finding a sensible way to split it seems very hard;
I do not see a way.
Do you?