From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem report #8 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:36:20 +0900 Message-ID: References: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144931812 28741 80.91.229.2 (13 Apr 2006 12:36:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 13 14:36:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FU142-0003oc-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:36:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FU142-0000uC-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FU13k-0000s1-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FU13j-0000rH-B2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FU13j-0000rA-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FU192-0006UA-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:41:56 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k3DCaMRF027020 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:36:22 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k3DCaMfE023722 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:36:22 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FU13c-0006fv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:36:20 +0900 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:59:18 -0700) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52823 Archived-At: In article <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>, Dan Nicolaescu writes: > I signed up to see the Coverity problem reports. > RMS asked me to post a few here. > There are 76 problems, I analyzed 10 of them, none of them were bugs > in emacs. > Hopefully more people can help with this. > If you analyze the problem, please add to the subject the resolution > which can be one of the following: > Status: > UNINSPECTED > BUG > FALSE > RESOLVED > IGNORE > PENDING Could you please explain which of the above to select in which situation. For instance, I think FALSE and RESOLVED are: FALSE -- the report was false alarm. RESOLVED -- the report correctly found a bug and it is fixed. But, I'm not sure about the others. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org