From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Problem report #31
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:10:32 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FTirQ-0002Yg-R0@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200604111548.k3BFmODN015091@scanner2.ics.uci.edu>
	<39858.128.165.123.132.1144776890.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144861964 11247 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2006 17:12:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 19:12:42 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTitN-0003Io-Hw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:12:33 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTitM-0006Tp-T1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:12:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTirU-0004S8-Ho
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:10:36 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTirS-0004P2-NE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:10:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTirS-0004Op-2r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:10:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FTiwZ-0002Mt-VB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:15:52 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FTirQ-0002Yg-R0; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:10:32 -0400
Original-To: herring@lanl.gov
In-reply-to: <39858.128.165.123.132.1144776890.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
	(herring@lanl.gov)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52787
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52787>

    Seems kinda unlikely that opening the null device would fail, but I
    suppose it's possible.  Should probably check this.

I put that in.  Thanks.