From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Defining your own defun breaks find-function-search-for-symbol
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:57:17 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FTMB3-00053W-V9@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <30417.1144454556@olgas.newt.com>
	<E1FSM0k-0007Zc-Qe@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<6350.1144627612@olgas.newt.com>
	<E1FT15k-0006ul-Rj@fencepost.gnu.org> <26869.1144708534@olgas.newt.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144774688 19919 80.91.229.2 (11 Apr 2006 16:58:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:58:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 11 18:58:07 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTMBk-0001Ey-Bj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:58:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTMBk-0005CI-1x
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:58:00 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTMB6-0004wj-2h
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:57:20 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTMB5-0004wL-BK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:57:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTMB5-0004w8-1e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:57:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FTMFy-00028D-UH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:02:23 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FTMB3-00053W-V9; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:57:18 -0400
Original-To: Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>
In-reply-to: <26869.1144708534@olgas.newt.com> (message from Bill Wohler on
	Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:35:34 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52688
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52688>

    >     However, would we want to rename the functions in this manner?
    > 
    > Yes.

    With Stefan's patch, this renaming won't be necessary and we're in good
    shape.

I do not follow.  Could you explain the connection between them?