From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem report #34 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:52:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <200604090700.k397038g005571@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <7274DD0D-375F-4B01-B77C-91FC03399B9A@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144652002 25075 80.91.229.2 (10 Apr 2006 06:53:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 10 08:53:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSqH1-0003Cv-EO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:53:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSqH0-0000dZ-5o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:53:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSqGo-0000bB-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSqGh-0000YF-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSqGh-0000YC-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:52:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FSqLE-0003k1-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k3A6qaSC030225; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:52:36 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k3A6qaCN022212; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:52:36 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FSqGI-0004Ry-00; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:52:34 +0900 Original-To: Ken Raeburn In-reply-to: <7274DD0D-375F-4B01-B77C-91FC03399B9A@raeburn.org> (message from Ken Raeburn on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:39:33 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52587 Archived-At: In article <7274DD0D-375F-4B01-B77C-91FC03399B9A@raeburn.org>, Ken Raeburn writes: >>> Description: Overrun of static array "(((coding)- >>> >spec).iso2022).requested_designation" of size 255 at position 255 >>> with index variable "charset" >> >> As it is assured that "charset <= 255", this is not an error. > But requested_designation only has 255 elements -- indices 0 through > 254. Oops, it was my typo. It is assured that "charset <= 254". In charset.h, we have this definition. /* Maximum value of overall charset identification number. */ #define MAX_CHARSET 0xFE --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org