From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Fkill_emacs NO_RETURN
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:27 -0400
Message-ID: <E1FSiPP-000769-Bn@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <u64li619x.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144621830 20908 80.91.229.2 (9 Apr 2006 22:30:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:30:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 10 00:30:29 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSiQO-0004VO-J4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:30:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSiQO-0002Qf-0H
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:30:28 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSiPR-00024U-7X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:29 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FSiPQ-000243-LA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSiPQ-00023v-A8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FSiTv-0001zz-RC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:34:07 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FSiPP-000769-Bn; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:27 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <u64li619x.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 09
	Apr 2006 21:40:10 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52572
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52572>

I deleted the NO_RETURN on Fkill_emacs,
because that was clearly the safest fix.

Another safe fix is to conditionalize the return statement with
#ifndef __GNUC__.  But I don't see a need to do so.  We should not
twist our code in knots just to satisfy a lint program.