From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem report #8 Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200604090659.k396xI5h005539@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <87lkuesl99.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200604091832.k39IWcY5020726@amrm2.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144621796 20721 80.91.229.2 (9 Apr 2006 22:29:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 10 00:29:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSiPq-0004QS-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:29:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSiPp-00029e-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSiPK-00021K-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSiPK-000212-F5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSiPK-00020w-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FSiTp-0001yc-LP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FSiPJ-00075O-F5; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:29:21 -0400 Original-To: Dan Nicolaescu In-reply-to: <200604091832.k39IWcY5020726@amrm2.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:32:38 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52571 Archived-At: > > There are 76 problems, I analyzed 10 of them, none of them were bugs > > in emacs. > Just to be clear: are the bug reports you posted to this list the ones > that you found to be not bugs, or the ones that you have not analyzed? The are the ones that I did not analyze. It sounds like there are 66 you did not analyze. I suggested you post just SOME of the ones not analyzed, and it looks like that's what you did. So there would be many others not yet analyzed which you have not posted. Could you please confirm that?