From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-byte-compile-compiler-macro Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1t3bh8soqw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <2wacbf6xt1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ek0olk4t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144295897 3658 80.91.229.2 (6 Apr 2006 03:58:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 03:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 06 05:58:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRLdQ-0003NI-9f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2006 05:58:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRLdP-0005g7-UG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRLdF-0005fb-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRLdD-0005ct-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRLdC-0005ch-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRLgr-0000Ps-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FRLdA-00042W-Sg; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:00 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:32:18 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52464 Archived-At: (eval-when-compile . (lambda (&rest body) (list 'quote - (byte-compile-eval (byte-compile-top-level - (cons 'progn body)))))) + (byte-compile-eval (cons 'progn body))))) What is the reason for removing byte-compile-top-level? Was the call superfluous before? + (or (fboundp handler) + (progn (byte-compile-warn + "Ignoring byte-compiler handler `%S'" handler) + nil)) I don't think this should warn. This warning would be generated whenever you compile calls to these functions and CL is not loaded. The warning isn't useful, because it describes a circumstance which does not mean anything is wrong. So please don't add the warning.