From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: sort-first arg to map-keymap
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:01:39 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FOjfX-0007aR-3N@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87acbcjsvq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1FOJwp-0005qC-H6@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87acbagxq3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143673386 18783 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2006 23:03:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 01:02:59 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOjgh-00083U-2i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:02:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOjgg-0005NZ-Lk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:02:50 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOjfZ-0004rH-Q6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:01:41 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOjfZ-0004qv-6i
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:01:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOjfY-0004qo-Ul
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:01:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOjhb-0003hQ-Fp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:03:47 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FOjfX-0007aR-3N; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:01:39 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87acbagxq3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:46:00 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52210
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52210>

    > You may be right, but why change this now?

    Just because the code (which is new in Emacs-22's subr.el) is (as mentioned)
    brittle, so it may bite us down the road.

I agree, but let's change it after the release.
It is not urgent to make it less brittle.