From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: suspicious GCPROs
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:27 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FKHsJ-0000OG-N2@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1FJm3I-00057h-00@etlken>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142872520 23500 80.91.229.2 (20 Mar 2006 16:35:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 20 17:35:19 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FLNLA-0002FP-0N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:34:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FLNL8-0000WN-Ub
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:34:43 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FKHsL-0006YB-Su
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:29 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FKHsK-0006XE-SI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:29 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FKHsK-0006X1-E8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:28 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FKHxE-0002fK-Va
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:33 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FKHsJ-0000OG-N2; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:27 -0500
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1FJm3I-00057h-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Thu, 16
	Mar 2006 15:33:40 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51881
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/51881>

I agree that those two gcpros in xterm.c and xfns.c
are unnecessary.