From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs Manual topics to remove?
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:41:38 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FIvjO-0006sC-VQ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1FISlA-0000H9-Dv@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87d5grwgtc.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<17428.40887.187946.405406@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<87veuji44y.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<fc339e4a0603130132y6efafc94y3c2e19528fcb5c1b@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142289810 16355 80.91.229.2 (13 Mar 2006 22:43:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:43:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 13 23:43:22 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FIvjc-0006Yo-EB
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:41:53 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FIvjc-0004fo-1L
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:41:52 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FIvjQ-0004f6-Py
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:41:40 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FIvjQ-0004ef-FL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:41:40 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIvjQ-0004eF-7h
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:41:40 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FIvnU-0001e6-6B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:45:52 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FIvjO-0006sC-VQ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:41:39 -0500
Original-To: "Miles Bader" <miles@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <fc339e4a0603130132y6efafc94y3c2e19528fcb5c1b@mail.gmail.com>
	(miles@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51576
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/51576>

    It does seem that it would be courteous to bring the authors of the
    text into the discussion; maybe they could suggest alternatives such
    as abridgement?

I have no time to discuss it with them.