From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Extended menu items, when are :enable and :filter computed?
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:55:11 -0500
Message-ID: <E1FEVXb-0002b7-L5@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <44010776.6020804@student.lu.se>
	<878xryp1bi.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1FDndt-0004x6-A3@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvy7zwzdcd.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1FDyDC-0007Bi-7C@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87wtffqxks.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141419358 2832 80.91.229.2 (3 Mar 2006 20:55:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:55:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 03 21:55:57 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FFHJ2-000493-8h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:55:20 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FFHJ2-0000im-Dr
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:55:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FEqS8-0004W9-Hh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:14:56 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FEqRu-0004Sz-Hp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:14:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEi6c-0003P4-O3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 02:20:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FEVYv-0004X2-HV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:56:33 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1FEVXb-0002b7-L5; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:55:11 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87wtffqxks.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:06:13 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51090
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/51090>

    > Is this optimization really worth while on modern computers?

    Of course.  The speed of the average computer is not relevant since faster
    computers simply means that the package authors can put more complex code in
    :enable and :filter.

They can, but I suspect most of them do not.