From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco Potorti` Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make bootstrap: need moral support. :-( Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140676353 4000 80.91.229.2 (23 Feb 2006 06:32:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Randal L. Schwartz" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 07:32:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FCA1e-0004Gu-7m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 07:32:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FC9fU-0006u9-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 01:09:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FBrIO-0003bx-8p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:32:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FBrHy-00034l-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBrGR-0001cE-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:30:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [146.48.83.182] (helo=pot.isti.cnr.it) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FBrMt-0002yl-Rc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:37:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pot by pot.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FBrGO-0006at-00; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:30:28 +0100 Original-To: Giorgos Keramidas In-reply-to: "keramida@ceid.upatras.gr"'s message of Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:33:18 +0200 Original-References: X-fingerprint: 4B2 6187 5C3 D6B1 2E31 7666 9DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50884 Archived-At: >=================================================================== >--- emacs/lib-src/etags.c (.../branches/gnu) (revision 26) >+++ emacs/lib-src/etags.c (.../trunk) (revision 26) >@@ -414,8 +414,8 @@ > static void canonicalize_filename __P((char *)); > static void linebuffer_init __P((linebuffer *)); > static void linebuffer_setlen __P((linebuffer *, int)); >-static PTR xmalloc __P((unsigned int)); >-static PTR xrealloc __P((char *, unsigned int)); >+PTR xmalloc __P((unsigned int)); >+PTR xrealloc __P((char *, unsigned int)); > > > static char searchar = '/'; /* use /.../ searches */ >@@ -6864,7 +6864,7 @@ > } > > /* Like malloc but get fatal error if memory is exhausted. */ >-static PTR >+PTR > xmalloc (size) > unsigned int size; > { >@@ -6874,7 +6874,7 @@ > return result; > } > >-static PTR >+PTR > xrealloc (ptr, size) > char *ptr; > unsigned int size; >%%% This patch is harmless, from the etags point of view. The choice for "static" was of theoretical cleanness and source documentation, but involved no practical issues. If you need that patch, I can apply it myself (I am the etags maintainer) or you can apply it, if you like it better. Just let me know.