From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: faq.texi Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:05:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878xstfkz2.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87d5i23qek.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87psm0n9x9.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87lkwnkmcb.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <8764npegbm.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87bqxgdevj.fsf@jurta.org> <87oe1gfbkd.fsf@jurta.org> <87zml09go4.fsf@jurta.org> <874q32n0o1.fsf@jurta.org> <87zmkn15zi.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140499185 877 80.91.229.2 (21 Feb 2006 05:19:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 21 06:19:44 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBPw5-0003xt-PN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:19:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBPvj-0001lC-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:19:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FBJF1-0002kn-UT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FBJB7-00005m-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:06:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBJ9d-0007Ej-Tf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:05:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FBJFl-0006Z2-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:11:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FBJ9d-0001Zq-85; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:05:13 -0500 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87zmkn15zi.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:48:17 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50838 Archived-At: > That is an interesting idea too. I somewhat worry about the > idea of repetition after M-s, since that makes it like a mode. I think different isearch modes are not necessarily bad. There are already a few: isearch case-sensitivity mode toggled by M-c, regexp mode toggled by M-r, search string editing mode entered by M-e. We are failing to communicate--you're talking about different kinds of modes.