From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: ERC file names clash in 8+3 filesystems
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:06:24 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F5vlo-0002n8-9H@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <uacd8ydcj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<fc339e4a0602031603o6a43b2e6p@mail.gmail.com> <umzh7o2sm.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139191736 14486 80.91.229.2 (6 Feb 2006 02:08:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 02:08:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: mlang@delysid.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mwolson@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 03:08:54 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F5voC-0003wu-Iu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 03:08:52 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F5vrT-0001B2-Lz
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:12:15 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F5vqW-0000h3-57
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:11:16 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F5vqV-0000gh-CP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:11:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5vqV-0000gV-2m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:11:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F5vpy-0008CZ-Gv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:10:42 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F5vlo-0002n8-9H; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:06:24 -0500
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <umzh7o2sm.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 04
	Feb 2006 12:07:21 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50065
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/50065>

    The MS-DOS port is still supported, and I don't see any reason to drop
    it just because a bunch of new files were added.

If it is still useful, certainly not.
But is it still useful?