From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs segfault on bootstrap
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:03:57 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F4t6z-0007Is-1b@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87zmljt9ra.fsf@downtown.mentenet.com>
	<38231.18.95.5.111.1138512672.squirrel@webmail.stupidchicken.com>
	<7wpsma7uyv.fsf@ece.lsu.edu> <87r76mexcf.fsf@downtown.mentenet.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138943125 22416 80.91.229.2 (3 Feb 2006 05:05:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:05:25 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 03 06:05:22 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4t8H-000065-7C
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 06:05:17 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4tBQ-0002fb-9s
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:08:32 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4tBG-0002dY-2w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:08:22 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4tBF-0002d3-JM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:08:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4tBF-0002d0-Ev
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:08:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F4tAC-0003Op-JO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:07:16 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F4t6z-0007Is-1b; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:03:57 -0500
Original-To: Clemens Schueller <c.schueller@gmx.at>
In-reply-to: <87r76mexcf.fsf@downtown.mentenet.com> (message from Clemens
	Schueller on Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:40:48 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49952
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49952>

    My CFLAGS Environment contained a "-O9".

I think that means you have encountered a GCC bug.
We should not just ignore it--GCC needs to be fixed, too.

Is it the same one that we have just been investigating,
or a different one?