From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Display slowness that is painful
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:16:28 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F4VtU-0005mn-Qn@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1F2c7V-00012t-3B@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87slr5c78p.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1F44cy-0001EU-M7@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<877j8fx43q.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138854157 3631 80.91.229.2 (2 Feb 2006 04:22:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:22:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 05:22:35 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4VzK-0008VP-5N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:22:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4W2Q-0008UY-0Q
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:25:42 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4Vxb-0006Ms-OL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:20:44 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F4Vxa-0006Mc-SM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:20:43 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4Vxa-0006MU-LY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:20:42 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F4VwM-0003Yf-Hs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:19:26 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F4VtU-0005mn-Qn; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:16:28 -0500
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <877j8fx43q.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:25:13 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49908
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49908>

    This is *really* not the time to make changes in redisplay.

Yes it is.  Even if we had started the pretest already,
we would fix this bug.  Or what are pretests for?