unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Display slowness that is painful
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:15:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1F4Vs7-0005Jr-Kw@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mzhbd6kv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:52:00 -0500)

    I'm confused.  How does it make sense to display characters in \XXX
    format instead?  Both methods produce gibberish (as one would expect
    of a binary file).  So we might as well choose the gibberish that
    redisplays faster.

Making it 4 times as fast is not enough.  It will still be
intolerable.  This ought to be hundreds of times as fast, and I am
sure it can be, with a fairly small change--once someone sees what
is taking the time.

This is a bug.  Please help fix it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-02  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-27 22:31 Display slowness that is painful Richard Stallman
2006-01-31  5:10 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-31 23:09   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-01  1:25     ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-01  2:59       ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-01  4:52         ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-01  5:15           ` Miles Bader
2006-02-02  6:02             ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-02  4:15           ` Richard M. Stallman [this message]
2006-02-02  4:50             ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-01 10:43       ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-03  2:06         ` Kenichi Handa
2006-02-03 10:15           ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-03 12:01             ` Kenichi Handa
2006-02-03 13:08               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-03 19:17             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-03 23:34               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-07  1:41                 ` Kenichi Handa
2006-02-02  4:16       ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02  5:55         ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-02  6:12           ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-02  9:50             ` David Kastrup
2006-02-02 14:02               ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-03 23:43                 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02 11:33           ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-03  1:50             ` Kenichi Handa
2006-02-03  9:55               ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-04 18:27               ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-03  5:04             ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-03 10:00               ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-03 23:01                 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-05  0:16                   ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-04 18:27                 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-04 21:18                   ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-05  1:59                     ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-06  2:06                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-06  8:22                         ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-07  6:06                           ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-07  9:14                             ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-08 19:03                               ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-09  9:20                                 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-09 20:10                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13  4:40                                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-13  4:40                                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-06  2:06                     ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-06  8:19                       ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-06  8:45                         ` Miles Bader
2006-02-06 10:34                           ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-07  6:06                         ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-05  0:30                   ` Miles Bader
2006-02-05  0:44                     ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-02 14:00           ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-01 10:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-01 23:10   ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-02  4:16   ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02 10:37     ` Andreas Schwab
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-19 17:43 Richard Stallman
2006-01-31  5:07 ` Evil Boris
2006-01-11 18:58 Richard M. Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1F4Vs7-0005Jr-Kw@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).