From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: goto-line trouble with narrowing
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:06:13 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F3ztN-0001CW-Ax@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m1F2AUi-0004QMC@rattlesnake.com>
	<E1F2c97-0001Al-Kw@fencepost.gnu.org> <drlghv$pvb$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<43DE93D7.2090104@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138734381 30137 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 19:06:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ihs_4664@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 20:06:16 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F40ni-0006Ez-M4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:04:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F40qj-0003Z7-Ub
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:07:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3zxK-0006yS-22
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:18 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3zxH-0006wT-5O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:16 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3zxG-0006wI-K3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F3zvm-0006Ix-T0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:08:43 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F3ztN-0001CW-Ax; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:06:13 -0500
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <43DE93D7.2090104@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:31:51 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49829
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49829>

    Why not include both variants in Emacs?

It isn't worth the cost in added complexity.