From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: tumme directory
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:06:11 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F3ztL-0001Bp-NK@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87r76t8afw.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1F3NMK-0000QU-5y@fencepost.gnu.org> <m23bj5s7tg.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138734353 30005 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 19:05:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 20:05:50 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F40n2-0005x9-Ec
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:03:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F40q3-00035P-RQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:06:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3zxK-0006xt-1c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:18 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3zxH-0006w3-55
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3zxG-0006vc-4C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:10:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F3zvm-0006IU-9R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:08:42 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F3ztL-0001Bp-NK; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:06:11 -0500
Original-To: Mathias Dahl <brakjoller@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <m23bj5s7tg.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Mathias Dahl on Mon, 30
	Jan 2006 22:51:39 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49828
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49828>

    > It should follow the usual convention of using .emacs.d
    > if it exists, etc., the same way other uses of .emacs.d do.

    Does that mean that we should accept Chong's fix? I know too little
    about how .emacs.d is used.

We should install a change to use .emacs.d
in accord with the standard conventions for using it.