From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ./make-dist for unicode branch Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bqyasvv6.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <877j8yse2a.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <873bjmryr5.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <87vewgca2p.fsf@emfox.3322.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138734222 29378 80.91.229.2 (31 Jan 2006 19:03:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, EmfoxZhou@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 20:03:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F40k8-00056d-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:00:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F40nA-0000uS-7A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:03:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F3zvh-0005JP-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:08:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F3zvf-0005Hc-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:08:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3zve-0005HE-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:08:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F3zuB-00066i-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1F3zrd-0000xf-GV; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:04:26 -0500 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:32:37 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49825 Archived-At: I thought that the point was to prevent making an incomplete tarball. The aim of this suggestion is to catch a simple mistake of running make-dist without bootstrapping first. To check for the other case of a bootstrap that failed is a different issue. If someone wants to do it, I don't object. If people don't want to bother, that's fine too. In any case, my suggestion is to test that simple.elc exists and give an error if it does not.