From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: "Misunderstanding of the lambda calculus"
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:46:42 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F3e30-0004VJ-Ud@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1F3FdP-0002xe-OW@monty-python.gnu.org>
	<200601291251.32808.jyavner@member.fsf.org>
	<857j8i51hk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138647842 27460 80.91.229.2 (30 Jan 2006 19:04:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jyavner@member.fsf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 20:04:01 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3eJf-0002V4-5X
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:03:55 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3eMd-0001Jf-Br
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:06:59 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3e74-00080x-Fk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:50:54 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3e73-000809-6m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:50:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3e72-0007zo-Pl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:50:52 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1F3e5L-0002wD-3f; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:49:07 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F3e30-0004VJ-Ud; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:46:45 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <857j8i51hk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:32:23 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49781
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49781>

    Uh, "archaic" and "alive" is not a contradiction.

Yes it is.  "Archaic" does not mean "old" or "early".
It means "obsolete".