From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ./make-dist for unicode branch Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:57:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bqyasvv6.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <877j8yse2a.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <873bjmryr5.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <87vewgca2p.fsf@emfox.3322.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138583068 4095 80.91.229.2 (30 Jan 2006 01:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, EmfoxZhou@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 02:04:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3NSx-0002zC-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 02:04:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3NVt-0007v6-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:07:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F3NPc-0005gV-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:00:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F3NPb-0005gA-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3NPa-0005fz-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:00:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F3NNo-0006Vy-4t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:59:04 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1F3NLx-0000H7-RS; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:57:09 -0500 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:11:16 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49724 Archived-At: > I think it is trivial. Just check whether simple.elc exists. It doesn't assure that the bootstrap was really successful. Does that really matter here? The point is to detect the case where no bootstrap was done. It would be nice to detect the case of a failed bootstrap also, but that is a different matter. It is ok to detect just the former.