From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ./make-dist for unicode branch Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:09:57 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87bqyasvv6.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <877j8yse2a.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <873bjmryr5.fsf@emfox.3322.org> <87vewgca2p.fsf@emfox.3322.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138237876 1857 80.91.229.2 (26 Jan 2006 01:11:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: EmfoxZhou@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 02:11:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1vfA-0000sp-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:11:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1vhv-0006by-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F1vhC-0006bJ-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F1vhA-0006aM-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1vhA-0006a4-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1F1veV-0005z9-87; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0Q19wCr028250; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:09:58 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0Q19vJ2023620; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:09:57 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F1ve9-0007UQ-00; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:09:57 +0900 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:53:20 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49561 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think a snapshot should be exactly like a release tarball, i.e. it > should include all the *.elc files etc. So one needs to build Emacs > before creating a snapshot. > In other words, a snapshot is NOT simply a checked-out CVS tree, it's > a tarball like any release, except that it was made from a > non-released code base. If that is the rule, I don't mind removing uni-*.el from the CVS tree again. Richard, shall I? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org