From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: allocate_string_data memory corruption Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:46:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vewha2zl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zmlq6w62.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u0bw6wwz.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <272681AE-627E-4FDF-BD16-246D423524AC@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138123200 28846 80.91.229.2 (24 Jan 2006 17:20:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 24 18:19:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1Rno-000789-3a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:17:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1RqV-0004a9-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:20:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F1RMJ-0006GV-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F1RMH-0006Ey-Q6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:49:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F1RMH-0006Ec-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:49:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F1RRD-0001F4-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1F1RJS-0000YP-SK; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:46:34 -0500 Original-To: Ken Raeburn In-reply-to: <272681AE-627E-4FDF-BD16-246D423524AC@gnu.org> (message from Ken Raeburn on Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:35:03 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49482 Archived-At: It may just push the memory corruption from the Lisp object pool to the malloc pool, since malloc isn't safe for signal handlers either. Yes it is; malloc uses BLOCK_INPUT.